All manuscripts submitted to Eunoia: Journal of Education and Learning undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure scientific quality and integrity.

Review Stages:

1. Initial Editorial Screening:

   • The editorial team checks the manuscript for scope relevance, formatting compliance, and completeness.

   • Submissions that do not meet the criteria may be rejected or returned for revision.

2. Plagiarism Check:

   • Manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software (e.g., Turnitin) with a similarity threshold of 20%.

3. Peer Review Process:

   • Manuscripts are sent to two independent reviewers who are experts in the subject area.

   • The journal uses a double-blind review system, meaning both the authors' and reviewers' identities are kept confidential.

4. Editorial Decision:

   • Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will choose one of the following outcomes:

     • Accepted without revision

     • Accepted with minor revision

     • Accepted with major revision

     • Rejected

5. Revision by Authors:

   • Authors are given the opportunity to revise their manuscript based on reviewer/editor feedback.

6. Final Editing and Layout:

   • Once accepted, the manuscript proceeds to final editing and layout before publication.

Review Timeline:

• The peer review process typically takes 4–6 weeks, depending on reviewer availability and author responsiveness.